Onalaska-Law.com
  • HOME Page
  • OWI/DWI/DUI Defense
  • Car Accidents and Personal Injury
  • Criminal Charges
  • ACTUAL CRIMINAL & OWI/DWI RESULTS
  • Motorcycle Accidents
  • Attorney Info
  • Contact Us
  • Onalaska-Law Blog
  • Map of Location in Onalaska
  • Court Directory & Legal Resources

NEW STUDY REVEALS SHOCKING CRIMINAL SENTENCING DISPARITIES IN WI                                                                COURTS 

12/1/2015

 
"THE SCALES OF JUSTICE OR A ROULETTE WHEEL?"
A newly released study by the Gannett news agency proves what most criminal defense lawyers in Wisconsin already knew: The length of a convicted person's sentence can largely depend on which county their case is in, and/or by which judge sits for the case.  

Every case is different, but most will agree that fairness in sentencing requires some degree of uniformity.  However, the study shows wild differences in the type and length of sentences from one county to another and, worse, from one judge to another within a county.  The study is aptly titled "The Scales of Justice or a Roulette Wheel?"  I am wondering if this may result in a new push for uniform sentencing standards or guidelines in Wisconsin. 

The Gannett study mined sentencing data for various crimes from "CCAP" (the online automated circuit court access program) at https://wcca.wicourts.gov/index.xsl  This allowed the authors to compare sentences for various categories of crimes, and sentencing judges, in a manner that appears to be highly objective and accurate.

Defendant's in Wisconsin criminal cases have an opportunity to substitute the judge assigned to their case.  See Wis. Stat. s. § 971.20.  As the study reveals, such is the disparity in the length of sentence from one judge to another in some counties, that it would seem to be blatant malpractice to not substitute the harsher sentencing judge.  Of course, then you also have to know--with some certainty--which judge will inherit the case, lest the client go 'from the frying pan to the fire.'  The process of judicial assignment is usually not random.  As is the case at the La Crosse County Circuit Court, the courts are allowed to assign a case to the next most substituted judge(s) in order to "equalize" the caseload.
 
I always take care to closely analyze the likely-assigned judge, and likely-substituted judge.  This is information a client must have to make an intelligent decision on whether to substitute a judge or not.  Many times, in cases I take over from other lawyers, this important issue was overlooked altogether.  

With cases that I know have the potential for prison, I have in the past commissioned my own sentencing study, using a similar mechanism used by the authors of the study, to determine the range of sentences for certain crimes in Wisconsin.  It provides an objective basis to keep judges focused on fairness.  The hope is to eliminate the subjective resources--such as the so-called "Pre-Sentencing Investigation" ("PSI") reports often relied upon now by Wisconsin judges.  These reports, in my opinion, are often hastily prepared, rarely have much "investigation" underlying them, and are merely one corrections officer's "gut" opinion on what should happen in a case.  These reports are given far too much weight, and they inject even more randomness into an already unpredictable process. 

Of course, I most always know what to expect in the La Crosse County, Trempealeau County, Buffalo County, Vernon County, Monroe County, and Crawford County courts.  But when the case is in a Wisconsin county that I do not practice in a lot, I talk to the lawyers in that county, and reach out to local attorneys on a "list serve" for input on the judge(s).  Now, however, I will first be looking at the Gannett study. 

Comments are closed.

    Author

    Christopher W. Dyer, a Wisconsin and Minnesota Trial Lawyer, serving La Crosse and surrounding counties.

    Archives

    January 2018
    December 2016
    October 2016
    August 2016
    June 2016
    February 2016
    December 2015
    October 2015
    July 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    December 2014
    October 2014
    August 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013

    Categories

    All
    Blood Testing
    Breath Testing
    Car Accidents
    Domestic Charges
    Forfeiture Cases
    Going To Court
    How To Choose A Good Lawyer
    Implied Consent
    In The News
    Minnesota Dwi
    Owi 1st
    Repeat Owi
    Traffic Court
    Urine Testing.

    RSS Feed