Onalaska-Law.com
  • HOME Page
  • OWI/DWI/DUI Defense
  • Car Accidents and Personal Injury
  • Criminal Charges
  • ACTUAL CRIMINAL & OWI/DWI RESULTS
  • Motorcycle Accidents
  • Attorney Info
  • Contact Us
  • Onalaska-Law Blog
  • Map of Location in Onalaska
  • Court Directory & Legal Resources

Supreme Court of United States Rules that Police Need Warrant to Forcibly Draw Blood from OWI/DWI Suspects

4/23/2013

 
Just days ago, the Supreme Court for the United State ruled, in Missouri v. McNeely, that the dissipation of alcohol in  blood does not create a per se exception to the Fourth Amendment requirement that a warrant be obtained before an officer conducts a search or seizure, in this case, drawing blood from a suspected impaired driver who refuses to voluntarily submit.  Instead, the courts will have to determine, on a case-by-case basis where no warrant was obtained, whether "exigent circumanstances" (an emergency) existed to allow the warrant requirement to be ignored by the police.  

For years, Wisconsin and Minnesota trial and appellate courts have ruled that an earlier U.S. Supreme Court decision, Schmerber v. California, 384 U.S. 757 (1966), permitted forced warrantless blood draws from suspected impaired drivers, so long as there existed probable cause and the method of drawing the blood was not patently unreasonable.  Therefore, the McNeely decision represents a monumental shift in the manner that blood draws will be conducted by police. 

A lot of questions remain uncertain at this point, including (1) whether breath or urine tests will be
given similar treatment under McNeely; (2) whether McNeely  will be applied retroactively to prior cases; and (3) whether McNeely has any application to cases where the suspect driver agreed, under the Implied Consent
Law, to submit a sample.  Remember, in Minnesota, a refusal to submit a sample of breath, blood, or urine is a crime, and the subject is told that when he/she supposedly consents to provide a sample.  How could agreement to submit a
sample, under threat of criminal prosecution, be anything but coerced consent?  And under the Wisconsin Implied Consent  Law, a suspect is told his/her driving privileges will be revoked, creating similar issues. 

One thing is for sure, this case is a very exciting development for this OWI/DWI attorney, and I will be working to answer these and other questions to give my clients every advantage possible.  Another thing, is that there will be a lot of judges losing sleep taking late-night calls on warrant applications.

Comments are closed.

    Author

    Christopher W. Dyer, a Wisconsin and Minnesota Trial Lawyer, serving La Crosse and surrounding counties.

    Archives

    January 2018
    December 2016
    October 2016
    August 2016
    June 2016
    February 2016
    December 2015
    October 2015
    July 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    December 2014
    October 2014
    August 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013

    Categories

    All
    Blood Testing
    Breath Testing
    Car Accidents
    Domestic Charges
    Forfeiture Cases
    Going To Court
    How To Choose A Good Lawyer
    Implied Consent
    In The News
    Minnesota Dwi
    Owi 1st
    Repeat Owi
    Traffic Court
    Urine Testing.

    RSS Feed