The Minnesota Supreme Court will issue its decision in State v. Brooks tomorrow, October 23, 2013, at 10 a.m. The
decision is expected to provide much-needed guidance to the MN District Courts, which have split on what the landmark decision, Missouri v. McNeely, means for people who have been BAC tested for blood, breath or urine under the Minnesota Implied Consent Law, especially those who have been tested afterMcNeely's release in April. The case is of such importance that the MN Supreme Court expedited its review after it was remanded by the Supreme Court of the United States.
You can find the Brooks decision here tomorrow. I can't wait to read it and supply some analysis.
decision is expected to provide much-needed guidance to the MN District Courts, which have split on what the landmark decision, Missouri v. McNeely, means for people who have been BAC tested for blood, breath or urine under the Minnesota Implied Consent Law, especially those who have been tested afterMcNeely's release in April. The case is of such importance that the MN Supreme Court expedited its review after it was remanded by the Supreme Court of the United States.
You can find the Brooks decision here tomorrow. I can't wait to read it and supply some analysis.
RSS Feed