Onalaska-Law.com
  • HOME Page
  • OWI/DWI/DUI Defense
  • Car Accidents and Personal Injury
  • Criminal Charges
  • ACTUAL CRIMINAL & OWI/DWI RESULTS
  • Motorcycle Accidents
  • Attorney Info
  • Contact Us
  • Onalaska-Law Blog
  • Map of Location in Onalaska
  • Court Directory & Legal Resources

"IGNORANCE OF THE LAW IS NO EXCUSE" (Unless You're a Cop).

12/16/2014

 
  "Heien gives the police more leeway to stop cars for the wrong reason, and that SUCKS." 
One of the first principles learned by students of criminal law is "Ignorantia juris non excusat", or "Ignorance of the law is no excuse".  That makes sense, doesn't it?  Otherwise, people could excuse their criminal actions by saying, "I thought that was legal."  However, yesterday the Supreme Court of the United States ("SCOTUS") ruled that the police--the one group that definitely should know the law--can be excused for their ignorance of the law, so long as the ignorance was "reasonable".

So what is a mistake of law, you ask?  For example, if a police officer pulled someone over because he/she thought the person's windshield was cracked, and it was not cracked, that's a mistake of fact.  If, however, he/she made the stop because of a cracked windshield, and cracked windshields are not even illegal, that's a mistake of law.   

HEIEN v. NORTH CAROLINA is the case, handed down just yesterday.  Heien gives the police more leeway to stop cars for the wrong reason, and that SUCKS.  In Heien, a police officer stopped a vehicle under the mistaken belief that having only one brake light was illegal in North Carolina.  It wasn't illegal.  This was a mistake Chief Justice Roberts found "objectively reasonable".  Cocaine was later found in the vehicle. The North Carolina Supreme Court reversed a lower appellate court, which ruled that the cocaine had to be suppressed because there was no grounds for the stop.  SCOTUS AFFIRMED. 

The holding in Heien states that, at least under the US Constitution, both mistakes of fact and mistakes of law are now excusable so long as they are reasonable mistakes, and suppression of evidence will not be required when a such mistake is made.  I call this tantamount to a "good-faith exception" for traffic stops.

Prior to this ruling, reasonable mistakes of fact by police were generally excusable, but reasonable mistakes of law were not.  In Wisconsin, that has been the law for over 15 years.   State vs. Longcore, 226 Wis. 2d 1, 594 N.W.2d 412 (Ct. App. 1999).  That principle was recently reiterated in State v. Brown, 2014 WI 269.  Therefore, if the police made a stop on a mistake of law and discover evidence as a consequence, that evidence must be suppressed, even if the mistake was reasonable.  

Heien does not necessarily mean that reasonable mistakes of law are now excusable in Wisconsin.  The Wisconsin court can interpret  the Wisconsin constitution in a way that is more generous to citizens' rights than the US Constitution has been interpreted by SCOTUS.  However, the Wisconsin court has generally followed the interpretations of SCOTUS on issues of Fourth Amendment law when deciding the scope of Article I, section 11, Wisconsin's counterpart to the Fourth Amendment.  Therefore, the decision does not bode good things for Longcore and Brown.  

Comments are closed.

    Author

    Christopher W. Dyer, a Wisconsin and Minnesota Trial Lawyer, serving La Crosse and surrounding counties.

    Archives

    January 2018
    December 2016
    October 2016
    August 2016
    June 2016
    February 2016
    December 2015
    October 2015
    July 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    December 2014
    October 2014
    August 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013

    Categories

    All
    Blood Testing
    Breath Testing
    Car Accidents
    Domestic Charges
    Forfeiture Cases
    Going To Court
    How To Choose A Good Lawyer
    Implied Consent
    In The News
    Minnesota Dwi
    Owi 1st
    Repeat Owi
    Traffic Court
    Urine Testing.

    RSS Feed